Bigfoots do not have tails. The
fact that they have no tails makes them great apes. Chimpanzees are great apes
and so are gorillas. I mention the gorilla because some types of gorilla are
huge like bigfoots. But I wish to write about the chimp and “science’s” claim
that humans and chimps share almost in whole the same DNA. The few percent
differences, however, make a huge difference. For one thing, when chimps have
tried to be taught to use sign language, they’ve failed miserably. So, these
experiments “actually prove that chimps are incapable of even the most
rudimentary forms of human language.” (This
from the book Life─How did it get here?
By evolution or by creation?) By comparison, a very young human can learn
as many as six languages, if not more, and this at the same time! The book The
Brain: Mystery of Matter and Mind states “The power of speech, … , uniquely sets humans apart from animals. Yet, the origins of language
remain one of the brain’s most baffling mysteries.”
Why am I writing about language
this week? One bigfoot field-researcher claims he’s captured the sound of two bigfoots
talking. I’m sure he believes this and perhaps the animals are mimicking human
speech, (we know that some animals and many birds can do this). What language
did he believe he heard the animals speak? That would be Spanish! One or two sightings
that I can remember mentioned bigfoots observed mimicking forest workers, road
crews and lumber jacks. So, if these observations can be believed, bigfoot
takes an interest in us humans and at times mimics us.
While driving through the forest,
I’ve many times looked up at the mountains and wondered what bigfoot thought of
the moving cars and trucks below him. Does he think of them as we think of a
column of ants? If he’s been close to the road, he, of course, knows otherwise.
I’ll be so glad when “science”
tells us that bigfoots exist. Why? Well, for a couple of reasons. One, I’ll be
glad for the laughing to stop. (Many of my friends don’t even know that I write
about bigfoot or believe the animal exists. I trust this information with very
few of my friends and acquaintances.) Second, after “discovery” funds no doubt
will be allocated to study the animal by science. At that point solid
information could be expected and we and the animal will be better off. This is
my opinion. Until next week, Linda Newton-Perry with Christopher Perry
Posts
2 comments:
Linda,
While your entitled to your opinion,it is way off base where BF is concerned.These creatures are far from great apes.The witness data and small amount of evidence we do have,indicates that these creatures are much closer to Homosapiens and far from apes.The first indication is the ovbious intellegience it has taken to stay so well hidden from discovery.As far as speech goes,back in the early 70's,Ron Moorehead and associates made many recordings of BF communicating with each other using speech.In recent years,Scott Nelson(a retired Navy cryptologist & code breaker)has studied and proven that the sounds Ron Moorehead & Alan Berry recorded were indeed BFs communicating to each other with speech.I suggest you research Scott Nelson & the Sierra Sounds.These animals are not apes,they are intellegent beings and some would say more intellegent that humans.
Thanks for the comment. My "opinion" includes: there is nothing on this earth that is more intellegent than humans. We, humans, we alone, were made in God's image, meaning we possess many of his attributes. I don't care what "science" will in the end call bigfoots. I know that they are animals and can only reproduce after their "kind." Science and the Bible will forever be at odds, until everyone believes that an all wise Creator is responsible for our world, space and so on. I believe in giving credit where credit is due. Best regards, Linda Newton-Perry
Post a Comment